Category Archives: Uncategorized

Bitcoin is Still Tied to the Tech Bubble

Bitcoin is part of the Everything Bubble.  It is not a form of money in most cases.  It is a speculative asset, although even the term “asset” is a stretch.

When the Israeli government attacked Iran, it sent stocks down.  Bitcoin was also down.  Gold was up.  This means that people still view gold as the ultimate safe haven.

After Iranian officials announced they were still open to negotiation, this was taken by many to mean that the conflict may be contained and that it wasn’t likely to expand into a massive war.  Stocks were up on Monday, largely because of this sentiment.  Bitcoin was also up.

Not Digital Gold

The point here is that Bitcoin is not digital gold.  It is not a form of money except in very rare circumstances.  It certainly isn’t a widely used form of money.  Things aren’t priced in Bitcoin.  They are priced in dollars.  Bitcoin is also priced in dollars.

Sure, the same thing can be said for gold because the government has effectively banned it as a common form of money.  But gold has a long history as a form of money, and it is still used as a store of value.  It also has other uses.

Bitcoin is a good store of value as long as the dollar price is going up.  But Bitcoin is heavily tied to the Nasdaq and tech in general.  If the tech bubble portion of the Everything Bubble pops, it is likely that Bitcoin will follow.

In fact, it is possible that Bitcoin could get hammered even more than the Nasdaq.  At least companies like Apple and Nvidia still have assets and earnings.  What does Bitcoin have?  It really has no uses at all other than faith by quasi-libertarian tech nerds who claim it can change the world and that it fixes all of our problems if we would just let it.

Bitcoin probably won’t go to zero because there will always be a small group of people who will die on the hill of Bitcoin.  They will always be there to buy, sell, and hold Bitcoin.  They will trade it between each other just to make sure it has some kind of monetary value.

You can certainly make money (in dollars) by speculating in Bitcoin, but it would be a mistake to think of this as an investment.  If the tech bubble collapses, Bitcoin could easily lose 90% or more of its value in terms of dollars.

Trump Makes War on Iran

The Israeli government has started a war with Iran by striking inside Iran with missiles.  Israeli officials have been saying for decades that Iran is just weeks or months away from getting a nuclear bomb.

After the initial attack, Marco Rubio came out and said that the U.S. is not involved in the strike against Iran.

So, the U.S. government gives money to Israel, gives weapons to Israel, gives intelligence to Israel, and commits to defending Israel as its closest ally, but we can be assured that the U.S. is not involved here.

Meanwhile, Trump comes out and posts that Iran should have made a deal sooner.  Maybe Trump should have told Israel that they would be on their own if they attacked Iran, but no such thing happened.  In fact, it is reported that the U.S. is assisting Israel in shooting down Iranian missiles as part of Iran’s retaliatory strike.

It’s interesting that Trump talks about negotiating with Iran.  It is like negotiating with a bank robber who is holding a gun to your head.  You tend not to have a lot of negotiating power at that point.  You basically have two choices.  You can give the person holding a gun to your head what they want, or you can refuse and try to defend yourself.  It isn’t really a negotiation for Iran.

“Iran Can’t Be Allowed to Have Nukes”

It’s amazing watching politicians and the media state over and over again that Iran can’t be allowed to have nukes.  They never even question the premise, and it is hard to imagine if anyone openly challenged this premise.

Why can’t Iran be allowed to have nukes?  And who says?

So, the U.S. government gets to dictate who gets to have nukes?  There is only one government on planet earth that has ever used nuclear weapons against a civilian population, and it wasn’t Iran.

There are now people saying that if Iran was allowed to get nukes that they would use them on Israel and the United States.  I mean, maybe now that Israel and the U.S. have essentially declared war on Iran and threatened to bomb them into the Stone Age.  But if these two countries just completely ignored Iran, why is there this assumption that Iran would strike?

Of course, even if Iran got nukes, it probably wouldn’t be capable of delivering a strike on the United States.

But is anyone actually dumb enough to believe this would happen if Iranian officials did have the capability?  They know that they would be obliterated 100 times over if they ever did that.

There are these great lines about Iran funding terrorism.  Maybe they funded Osama bin Laden.  Oh wait, that was the U.S. government.  Maybe Iran funded terrorists who took over Syria.  Oh wait, again, that was the U.S. government.

Also, let’s all remember the Libya model, where they agreed to give up their weapons.  After that, Obama and Hillary marched in there and killed Gaddafi.  With that example, why would any country openly give up their weapons to please the United States government?

At Least We Don’t Have Kamala?

One thing that Trump supporters have said is that Trump didn’t start any new wars in his first term in office.  Of course, he continued many of the wars and he also got close with Iran by assassinating an Iranian official.

But here we are less than 5 months into Trump’s second term and we have seen Yemen bombed and now a war with Iran.  Plus, Trump has not been able to end the war in Ukraine, and he continues to fund the slaughter of tens of thousands of innocent people in Gaza.

If this is a peace president, I don’t want a peace president.

It is even hard these days to hear Trump supporters who may be a little disappointed with his foreign policy say that at least we don’t have Kamala.

There have been a few good things out of Trump’s presidency the last 5 months, but it all seems to be diminished quite a bit when we are facing major wars and conflicts.  Sure, it might be great that Trump has curtailed DEI policies, but does that even compare to getting in a new war?

What is the line in the sand for the hardcore Trump supporters?  What if we get into a world war with Russia or China?  What if nukes are flying across continents?

Will the Trump supporter being incinerated by a nuclear bomb yell one last time, “At least we didn’t get Kamala”?

Lower Price Inflation, Recession Still on the Table

The latest CPI numbers came out, slightly better than expected.  For May 2025, the CPI was up 0.1%, with the year-over-year now at 2.4%.

The median CPI for May came in at 0.2%, which is a lower reading than we have seen in a long time.  The year-over-year median CPI sits at 3.5%.

Prices aren’t going down.  They are still going up – by 2.4% per year if we trust the government’s statistics.  The rate of price inflation is going down, but prices are still going higher on top of the already high prices we have seen.  But many will celebrate this news and say that inflation is going down.

The economic picture seems to be looking up after a couple of brutal months.  In April, there was major turmoil in the equity markets, largely because of Trump’s erratic tariff policy.  Things have seemed to calmed down, and the markets are going back up near their all-time highs.

But we are still facing higher tariffs than we were three months ago, and you have to imagine there have been a lot of supply disruptions and misallocation of resources with businesses trying to figure out what they can and can’t feasibly import and export.

The Balance Sheet and the Yield Curve

The other statistics don’t lie.  They still don’t look good for the economy ahead.  It will be amazing if Trump can somehow manage to get an economy that at least bumps along.

The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet is still going down in accordance with its current policy.  It is still over $2.5 trillion higher than it was at the beginning of March 2020.  But it has also gone down by about $2.3 trillion since its peak in 2022.

In other words, we are still in monetary deflation mode, in spite of what is happening with interest rates.

The yield curve was mostly inverted for 2023 and most of 2024.  It has slowly begun to normalize.  The 30-year yield is just under 50 basis points (half a percentage point) higher than the 3-month yield.  That isn’t much, but it also isn’t inverted any longer.

Mr. “Too Late” Powell (Trump’s nickname for the Fed chair) is probably too late by establishment standards.  It may or may not be a political thing, but it is a bit surprising that the Fed hasn’t been more aggressive in lowering its target rate.  When the Fed does resume with its rate lowering, it will drive down short-term yields.

The yield curve and the monetary deflation are signaling a recession ahead.

Is it possible that this economy will defy the odds?  Will the trend break and we somehow won’t get a recession?

I can’t say it is impossible, but I also can’t deny the reality that these are indicators of a recession.  In spite of the strong equity markets over the last few weeks, I am still expecting a recession ahead.

Elon vs. The Donald

On April 2, 2025, I wrote the following:

“If there is a fallout between these two personalities, then watch out.  The danger is that Trump gets rid of Musk and steps up his status as war criminal and chaos maker.”

I knew there was a high risk of a fallout between these two.  It descended even faster than I could have imagined.

I wrote an article on June 4, 2025 about Musk coming out against the “big beautiful bill”.  Sometimes I wait a few days to write and publish an article just to gain more perspective on the facts.  Perhaps I should have waited with this article on Elon Musk.  A lot happened right after I published it.

Elon Musk and Donald Trump have several things in common.  They also have some things that aren’t in common.  Aside from being wealthy and well-known, they are both infamous for their use of social media.  They like to post things, oftentimes without giving it a lot of thought.

After Elon publicly started criticizing the BBB, which he was right to do, things got personal very quickly.  I have heard Trump say much worse things about people, but he still couldn’t resist going after Elon for attacking his BBB.

Bringing in the Epstein Files

The final icing on the cake was when Elon posted that the reason the Epstein files weren’t released is because Trump’s name is in them.

I thought this was a mistake by Musk.  It makes it really tough to ever repair this relationship.

We already know that Trump knew Epstein.  The question is whether Trump was actually involved in trafficking anyone or having a relationship with any underage girls.  Just because Trump’s name is in the files doesn’t mean he necessarily did anything criminal or immoral.

If Elon is suggesting that Trump did do something immoral and criminal regarding Epstein, it kind of makes Elon look bad too because he had stayed quiet about it.  So, if Trump had requested more DOGE cuts in legislation, Elon would have stayed quiet about Trump’s criminal behavior?

This is why this somewhat vague post was a mistake.  It would have been best for Elon Musk to keep hammering away on government spending.  It would have been even better if he had just kept going after government spending while ignoring any personal attacks from Trump.

But, these two can’t help themselves.

It has been reported that Musk has since deleted this particular post.

A good general rule in life is to wait to post or say something, especially when you are emotional.  If you just give it 24 hours, you will gain a lot more clarity.

A Trump Nickname

Trump is known for giving his enemies nicknames.  If his enemy ends up being an ally, then he will drop the nickname.

Lil’ Marco is now the Secretary of State.  Remember Low-Energy Jeb and Lyin’ Ted Cruz?  Of course, there is also Sleepy Joe and Crooked Hillary.

You have to wonder if Trump will come up with something for Elon.  Maybe “Crazy Elon”.  Maybe “Maniac Musk”.

The problem for Trump is that Elon is too much like himself.  Elon will likely not stay quiet.  He owns X (formerly Twitter).  He has over 200 million followers.  He also has the truth on his side when it comes to government spending and this bloated spending bill.

Trump may win this battle with a majority of his supporters, but you have to believe that some hardcore fiscal conservatives, along with some libertarians who loosely supported Trump, will side with Elon Musk on this issue.  Even if it is just 10% of Trump supporters who side with Elon, that could mean a 5% drop in Trump’s approval ratings.

A Trump nickname might not have the same impact as what he has been able to inflict in the past.

Understanding Economics

The big difference here between Trump and Elon is that Elon understands basic economics.  He understands that tariffs harm American consumers.  He understands that we need a reduction in government in order for our economy to thrive.

I am giving Trump the benefit of the doubt here by saying that he is economically illiterate.  If Trump does understand economics, then he is lying and doing great damage to the country for political or other reasons.

If Trump wanted to enact significant cuts to the budget, especially the waste and corruption exposed by DOGE, he could do so.  If he made this a signature issue, it would force the hand of the Republicans in Congress, who are mostly awful people.

Clint Russell had a nice post about this situation.

I would just add that our lives could be so much better with a massive reduction in government spending.  It’s not just about avoiding hyperinflation and/ or default.  Our standard of living could be vastly better if we saw a significant reduction in government spending.

One other important point is that this isn’t just about balancing the budget.  It is about the government consuming our resources.  To paraphrase Ron Paul, I would rather an unbalanced budget with $1 trillion in total spending than a $6 trillion budget that is balanced.

Elon Musk, whatever you think of him, is trying to do a service for humanity by making this a big issue.  He understands that we need to address government spending if any of us are going to prosper in the long run.

Elon Musk Sends a Shot Across the Bow

Elon Musk had previously hinted that he wasn’t too pleased with the spending coming out of Washington DC, even with the Republicans controlling a majority in the Congress.  But he was still somewhat subtle and was trying to stay positive about the work done by DOGE.

Now that Musk has left as something of a temporary government employee, his frustration has come out.  And it has come out quite strong.

I have been speculating about possible trouble in paradise between Musk and Trump.  It’s not that two big personalities can’t get along and work together.  The problem is that they have very different visions.

Trump talks a good game at times about fighting off the deep state and getting our economy in order, but then he supports his “Big Beautiful Bill”.  The BBB is certainly big in its spending.  It is beautiful for the establishment and the ruling elite, but it is not so beautiful for the average American who is getting ripped off.

On June 3, 2025, Musk started off with this X post (tweet).

“I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore.  This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.  Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.  You know it.”

Musk had many things to say that day.

Responding to a chart of the U.S. national debt, Musk said: “Mammoth spending bills are bankrupting America!  ENOUGH”.

He also said:

“We need a new bill that doesn’t grow the deficit.”

Taking on Trump?

Musk is not directly attacking Trump by name, but he is attacking the bill that Trump has endorsed.

Trump has been ruthlessly attacking the best members of Congress for not supporting his big beautiful bill.  Trump really went after Thomas Massie and said that someone should primary him.  More recently, Trump went after Rand Paul just for saying that he can’t support the bill because it allows the debt to grow by too much.

Well, guess who Elon is very loosely aligning himself with now?

He isn’t saying a lot, but he did seem to respond positively to posts from Paul and Massie (and Ron Paul, too).  Musk is going after Trump’s position without directly going after Trump.

You had to wonder how long this bromance would last.  Trump is so unpredictable that we don’t know if he will finally come out swinging against Musk or if he’ll just mostly ignore him.  There is also the option that Trump could completely change his own position on this, but it would be difficult at this point for Trump to veto or stop the big beautiful bill that he has been praising so much.  I don’t think a man with his ego could do this.

Who is Trump Trying to Serve?

Will Trump be able to read the political tea leaves on this one?  I think that a large segment of Republicans will side with Musk over Trump on this issue.  Of course, I mean the average Republican voter.

The Republicans in Congress are mostly on board with this spending bill.  They are the establishment.  They like the money and the power.  There a many congressional Republicans who have publicly praised Musk and the work of DOGE because they knew it was popular.  Yet, they will vote for this massive spending bill.  They were either lying about supporting the work of DOGE or they are too cowardly to oppose Trump and his BBB.

Trump has been one to campaign on behalf of the little guy.  At least rhetorically, he has opposed the ruling establishment.  But here, he is completely on the side of the establishment and big government.  He is siding with creeps like Mike Johnson while sticking it to the average American.  Elon Musk seems to be genuinely trying to get government spending under control.

I know many people accuse Musk of trying to profit off his involvement in politics.  I find this incredibly hard to believe.  Musk has hurt his companies by being so involved in politics.  He was already the richest man in the world.  He could have just said something nice about Trump when he was elected and left it at that.  He didn’t need this grief.

Even if Musk is doing this for nefarious reasons, he is still correct in most of the things he is saying about runaway deficits and big spending.  And for whatever reasons Trump has for supporting this bill, he is completely wrong and is doing harm to the country for it.

I truly believe that a lot of Republicans are going to side with Musk here.  Trump better play his cards very carefully or he could lose the support of a lot of his base.

He should have lost that support already with the awful things he has been doing since around the end of March.  But this is too obvious even for most Republicans.  Trump is clearly on the side of the establishment and big spending with this spending bill.  His support for this BBB is undercutting everything that DOGE did.

Musk is right to lash out at this monstrosity.  We’ll see if Trump is smart enough to wake up to what is happening.

Trading the Gold-to-Silver Ratio

This is not something you would typically hear about listening to the corporate financial media or most other media.  We don’t hear a lot about gold and silver anyway unless you run in those circles.

If you don’t own any gold or silver or investment vehicles that mimic the metal prices, then you should just get started when you can.  Gold and silver – but especially gold – are great hedges against dollar depreciation and general overall economic turmoil.  They also serve as a great form of diversification.

Gold is not highly correlated with stocks and bonds.  There are periods where they are loosely correlated, but there are other times when they diverge.  This is part of the reason I recommend the permanent portfolio.  The diversification smooths out the ride for your investments.

The Historical Ratio

The current gold-to-silver ratio is about 100.  This means that the price of gold is about 100 times higher than the price of silver.

It is a nice round number, so it makes it easy to visualize right now.  The current price of gold is around $3,300 per ounce.  The current price of silver is around $33 per ounce.  This gives us an approximate ratio of 100 to 1.

And while gold and silver tend to move up and down in price together, there are obviously differences.  A gold-to-silver ratio of 100 is historically high.

In March and April of 2020, the ratio briefly hit around 112.  Of course, this was during COVID hysteria and lockdowns.  When times are really tough, gold tends to be the favorite.

Other than that brief period, the ratio hasn’t been over a 100 in decades.  It barely touched 100 in the early 1990s.  You can see a 50-year chart here.

In 1980, during the major gold and silver bubble, the ratio actually fell below 20.  This was coming off the major inflation of the 1970s.  It was also a time when the Hunt brothers thought they could corner the silver market.  It was an interesting time for gold and silver, but the ratio below 20 is not representative of typical times either.  Something in the 60 to 70 range seems more normal, but who knows what normal is anymore.

Trading the Current Ratio

This is all to say that the current ratio near 100 seems quite high by historical standards.  There are certainly valid reasons for gold trading at such a high price to silver.  The biggest reason is that central banks are buying gold as a form of reserves.  Central banks almost never buy silver, at least that we are aware of.  In our world of sanctions, wars, and tariffs, it makes sense that countries want to diversify out of the U.S. dollar and hold more gold.

If the gold-to-silver ratio falls to a more typical range, then that means that silver is going to go up more than gold or that silver will fall in price less than gold.

If you believe that the ratio will revert to the mean (or to just a more normal level), then silver seems to be the better bet right now.

I still favor gold overall as an investment because of its history as a form of money and the implicit backing it serves for central banks.  Gold and gold-related investments should have a core place in your portfolio.

But if you already own gold and are looking to buy or sell precious metals, then consider trading the ratio.

If you want to sell a small portion because the price is high right now, then sell a little bit of gold instead of silver.

If you want to add more precious metals to your portfolio, then consider adding more silver than gold at this time because there seems to be more of an upside for silver.

If you own a lot of gold and little or no silver, then now may be a good time to sell off a little bit of gold and buy silver with the proceeds.  Consider it something like a carry trade.

Warning

We do live in an unpredictable world, and there is no guarantee that anything is going to happen, particularly with the economy.  Maybe a gold-to-silver ratio of 100 is the new normal.  Maybe it will go to 200 as sanctions and trade wars intensify and central banks load up on more gold.

This is to say that there is no guarantee that the ratio will go down any time soon.  And even if it does go down, it might simply mean that we’ve hit a deep recession and gold went farther down in price than silver.

The ratio is a tool.  It is just one tool.  It doesn’t predict the future for us.  But if you want to play the odds, it looks like the price of silver should be going up against the price of gold if there is any kind of reversion to the mean.

You should still have your core gold investments as part of your main portfolio no matter what the ratio looks like.

Tariffs are Welfare for Domestic Companies

Opponents of government welfare have their various reasons.  Libertarians generally oppose government welfare on the grounds that it is immoral to take one person’s property (money) and give it to someone else.

Still, there is also a utilitarian argument against welfare.  Libertarians can join conservatives in criticizing government welfare because it gives the wrong incentives.  When someone receives welfare because they don’t have a job or don’t make much money, it encourages that person to continue the same behavior.

Someone who receives money for not having a job is more likely to not get a job in the near future.

Unfortunately, government welfare can also create a sense of entitlement.  Even more, it can create resentment.  Look at what happened to Elon Musk when he attempted to cut government spending.  He was attacked ruthlessly, particularly by people who had a financial stake.

When was the last time you heard a welfare recipient declare publicly that they are so thankful for the support they receive?

Disincentives for Companies

Just as welfare creates disincentives for individuals to produce wealth, it does the same for companies.

While tariffs are a form of taxation, they act as a form of welfare for certain companies.  And as with welfare, they create a sense of entitlement and resentment.  Tariffs can also prop up an otherwise bad company.

Let’s say you have an American company that makes and sells baby dolls.  Without any import tariffs, the company can barely exist because of competition from other companies that have their baby dolls made in China.

When there is a steep enough import tariff, all of a sudden, the American toy company can produce and sell baby dolls and make a good profit doing so.  Since the costs for the competing companies is so much higher with the tariffs, they are unable to sell baby dolls at the previous price.  This is a big advantage for the American producer that doesn’t have the added tariff cost.

The problem is that the American producer couldn’t compete without the tariff.  Maybe some of that had to do with taxes and regulations within the United States, but then these should be reduced.  You don’t make it a level playing field by making it more difficult for other companies.

Without the tariffs, the American toy producer would have been forced to be more cost efficient in order to compete.  If it didn’t do so, it would probably go out of business.


With the tariffs, there is no longer the incentive to improve operations.  The company can be far less efficient than some foreign companies, yet still outsell and outcompete them.

Bad Economics

The key to our living standards is wealth production.  Resources should be allocated in accordance with consumer demand.  Part of resource allocation is having producers be efficient.  By enacting tariffs and propping up just the domestic companies, it is a misallocation of resources.

Profits and losses are a signal in the marketplace.  Profits are a signal to do more of something.  Losses are a signal to do less of something.  You wouldn’t invest your money in a company that is losing money unless you expected the company to turn things around rather quickly.

Tariffs are a disruption to the profit and loss signal.  An American company that was not profitable without the tariffs might be made profitable with the tariffs.  This means that more investment would flow to this company, and the company would keep doing what would be deemed inefficient in a free market.

So, not only do tariffs increase prices, but they can also drive investment towards less efficient producers.

Like welfare, tariffs redistribute wealth and misallocate resources.  They disincentivize companies to be more cost efficient.  Overall, tariffs make us poorer than we otherwise would have been.

Preparing for Financial Disaster, Subtly

It is generally a bad idea to make important decision under duress, unless it really is urgent.  Sometimes people get a sense of urgency for something that should be well thought out.

For example, think about when there is a housing mania.  The prices are going up at a much faster pace than price inflation.  A house that is listed for sale might get multiple offers that are actually above the listing price.

Now think about someone who doesn’t own a house but wants to own a house.  They might get a sense of panic.  If the prices keep going up 10% or 20% per year, they will never be able to get into a house.  I have heard people say that they need to buy now before it is too late.

You should never feel rushed into a making a decision like this.  It will end up being a bad decision.  At the same time, you also don’t want paralysis where you avoid ever making an important decision.  Of course, not making a decision is making a decision.  If you never actually make an offer on a house, that is making a decision.

The point is that you should give yourself time to make important decisions.  This is why it is generally a bad idea to rush into a marriage.

Decisions in Advance

There are some people who think America is facing financial disaster.  They are probably correct.  It just depends on how much of a disaster it is.

If you think we are headed for financial disaster, or even if you think there is just a decent chance of it happening, then you should prepare accordingly.

It doesn’t make much sense to throw up your hands and close your eyes and hope for the best.  You don’t want to say, “I’ll deal with it when the time comes.”

Sure, you will have to deal with it when the time comes, but it will be far easier to deal with it if you somewhat prepare in advance.

This certainly includes your investments and personal money matters.  If you think the stock market is going to crash by 80%, then you obviously want to diversify out of stocks.

But I believe that being mentally prepared is incredibly important and often overlooked.  I have talked (written) about this regarding recessions.  Just knowing and mentally preparing for a coming recession will put you ahead of most people.  It becomes a lot less painful when it hits.

If you are living the good life and ignore any threats of a recession, it will be far more painful when it does hit.  You may be forced to adjust your lifestyle in a dramatic way.

It is like anything in life.  If you keep your expectations in check, then there is less disappointment.  This doesn’t mean being an eternal pessimist.  It just means living in reality.

Life Goes On

One problem I see for people who are trying to prepare for financial disaster is that they get too wrapped up in the hype, and they make bad decisions that go too far.

For example, think about someone who actually predicted the 2008 financial crisis in advance.  Let’s say that someone had a crystal ball and could see the general trends in the economy ahead.  They knew the banks would be in big trouble.  They knew that some financial institutions would be going under.  They knew that the stock market would crash.

If they didn’t know any more details than that, they might have pulled all of their money out of the banks.  But in retrospect, this wasn’t necessary.  Anybody with an FDIC-insured bank account didn’t lose their money.  The government isn’t good at keeping promises, but it has definitely been good at keeping this promise in order to keep the banking system functioning.

(I fully understand that the government causes much of the disfunction in the banking industry in the first place.)

Also, someone with a crystal ball might have seen the stock market crash in 2008.  But let’s hope they had a crystal ball that could see in the future past March 2009 when stocks hit their bottom.  If you had bought U.S. stocks in March 2009, you would have done very well up to this point 16 years later.

The point is that life goes on.  Most things keep functioning and humming along.  The stock market still functions.  Even when it crashes, most stocks typically come back.  If you are buying a diverse group of stocks (an index fund), you won’t get hurt by a few really bad stocks.  As long as the overall market recovers, then so will your fund.

Don’t Overdo It

I say all this because some people take extreme actions as if civilization is coming to an end.  The problem is that it costs them a lot of time and money.

It’s always possible that we could have a zombie apocalypse.  There could be a major nuclear war.  There could be a major breakdown in the division of labor.  If we get to that point, then it will not be much a world to live in.  Even if you have food stored and a getaway shelter in the woods, you still might not last long.

It is better to prepare for a less dramatic situation that is still tough.  If you think we are going to have 20% price inflation and some supply shortages, that seems to be a more realistic outcome.  If you buy some extra necessities in bulk ahead of time to ease the burden, then what’s the worst (best) that will happen?  We only get 2% inflation and you use up the extra paper towel and toilet paper that you bought before.  You still might have saved money.

It is a bad idea to make life-changing decisions for things that are highly improbable.  I am talking about someone who takes all of the money out of their bank account to buy gold, bullets, and food.  By the way, the gold won’t do you much good if there is truly a breakdown in the division of labor.

I have read about people making some crazy decisions.  They get it in their head that some event is going to happen, and they go completely overboard in preparing for it.  This tends to go especially poorly for a man who is married.  Guess what?  Your wife doesn’t want to live off the grid in the woods.

I know the U.S. government is soon headed for $40 trillion in debt (not counting the unfunded liabilities).  I know price inflation is still alive and well.  I know we had an inverted yield curve in 2023 and 2024.  I know we have an Everything Bubble that could pop at any time.

Still, life goes on.  We will most likely continue to have electricity and the internet.  We will still have a somewhat functioning banking system.  The stock market isn’t going away, even if it crashes by 80%.  People will still buy and sell houses, even if interest rates are at 15% and there are a lot of foreclosures.  People will adjust.

Prepare smartly.  You can buy into the hype of financial disaster to a point, but life will most likely go on.

Where is My DOGE Check?

“We won.  What the f**k did we win?  Every day I look at the mailbox for my O.J. prize.  Nothing!” ~Chris Rock on the reaction of black people to the O.J. Simpson verdict

This is conservatives and libertarians who originally cheered on the wrecking ball that was DOGE in late January and early February of 2025.

Every day I look at the mailbox for my DOGE check.  Nothing!

Do you remember the DOGE checks that Trump and Musk briefly talked about?  Some of those great savings were going to be rebated back to the American people in form of $5,000 checks.

There is just a slight problem.  There are no “savings”.  Any so-called savings have been more than offset by additional increases in government spending elsewhere.

Elon Musk originally said that we could cut the federal budget by $2 trillion per year.  Then he said it was probably more realistic to expect $1 trillion per year to start out.  Then he went down to something like $150 billion.

$150 billion?  That is around a one-month deficit for the U.S. government these days.  So, you might be able to balance the budget for one month?  What about the $150 billion per month deficit for the other 11 months of the year?

The crazy thing is that we won’t actually see a cut of $150 billion per year.  The budget will continue to increase in size.

What Was All This For?

DOGE was a good idea.  Even if it accomplishes nothing in terms of budget cuts right now, at least it pointed out some of the egregious stuff that comes out of Washington DC.

It wasn’t just that there is wasteful spending.  In those short few weeks of DOGE mania, it exposed that our tax money is actively used against us.  It is used to propagandize us, to destroy our culture, and to run the world empire.

Just for the exposure of USAID, we should all be thankful to Elon Musk for this.  I don’t believe Musk went in there with bad intentions.  From a personal standpoint, he would have been far better off not getting involved in politics.  It has actually cost him a lot of money and given him a lot of grief.

You have to wonder what Elon Musk thinks about all of this now?  It’s like Edward Snowden spending his life in exile in Russia.  Was it all worth it?  You expose all of this wrongdoing and you get bad consequences. Meanwhile, much of the American populace just shrug their shoulders if they even pay attention at all.

“Oh well, the NSA has been spying on me.  I hope they enjoyed reading my email to Aunt Betty today.”

“Oh well, the U.S. government is funding transgender comic books overseas and funding foreign media companies.  I hope those media companies start covering some more things of interest to me.”

Elon Musk has to realize that DOGE is a total flop at this point.  When Trump attacked Thomas Massie for questioning a bloated budget and not issuing rescissions for the things DOGE found, Musk had to have known that the honeymoon was over.  That’s why he is stepping away and trying to fix his businesses that have suffered.

Chaos With No Benefit

Everything seemed to start out so well at the beginning of the second Trump term for people who care about liberty.  It seemed that maybe we would actually get something different this time.

DOGE did many things where even a fiscal conservative could disagree.  Forcing government employees back into the office might actually cost more money because you need to provide office space for people who previously worked at home.

Still, the overall spirit of DOGE was that maybe we could apply an ounce of common sense and stop the free ride for so many people living off of Uncle Sam.  DOGE was a major disruptor of the status quo.

Most people working at government jobs are not like the elite who rule over us.  Sure, some of them have a power complex, but most of them are just going to work and making an income.

Their lives have been majorly disrupted.  Maybe you say, “good”.

But what’s it all for?  I would rather a major disruption of the military-industrial complex.  Instead, Trump is bragging about the first $1 trillion “defense” budget.

Attacking millions of government workers and contractors was not the low hanging fruit.  And again, it hasn’t actually produced any cuts.  The money has basically just been reallocated.

Trump and members of Congress could demand rescissions of the things exposed by DOGE.  But with the exception of a few people in Congress, that isn’t happening.  All of that work and political capital was spent to expose this stuff, and we get nothing out of it.

It has created a ton of chaos with no actual cuts.

We aren’t getting DOGE checks.  We aren’t getting a reduction in the deficit.  We aren’t getting a reduction in overall spending.  We got all of the chaos with no immediate benefit.

Trump: Let Them Eat Cake, and Have Just Two Dolls

There was an interesting moment recently when Donald Trump stated that kids in the U.S might have two baby dolls instead of 30.  This was in reference to his tariffs on China, which is seemingly an admission that his tariffs will cause higher prices.

China does export a lot of toys to the United States, which would include baby dolls.  Apparently, Trump thinks that your child can have just 2 dolls instead of 30 so that he can make America great again.

This is Trump’s moment of “Let them eat cake.”

It takes especial gall from someone like Trump to make this comment about how many baby dolls your children should have.  Trump owns multiple luxurious properties.  The faucets in his places are probably gold-plated.

Is Trump really going to play the role of complaining about excess materialism?  Trump is the face of excess materialism.  It is like when some rich politician tells you to ride your bike to work while he flies on his private jet to a climate change conference.

Maybe Trump can become the new leader of the World Economic Forum.  The slogan can be: “Let them eat bugs and only have 2 baby dolls.”

What Else Should be Limited?

If Trump is going to complain about Americans having too much wealth, what else will he suggest?

Maybe we should only have 27-inch televisions instead of 55-inch televisions.  Maybe you don’t really need that king-sized bed.  It is really more of a luxury than a need.

Here is another issue that Trump didn’t address.  What about a family that is just barely getting by before the new tariffs?  What if they are barely able to pay the electric bill and the grocery bill each month?  They were able to get together just enough money to buy a baby doll for their daughter for Christmas.

Should that family not pay their electric bill next year, or should they not give a single Christmas present to their daughter because the price of toys has gone up?  Most kids don’t have 30 dolls.  Maybe some have more toys than they play with, but it is probably a variety of toys.

And what about things that aren’t toys?  If the price of furniture goes up, is he going to say that a family should only have one bedroom dresser for the whole family?

Excess Materialism vs. Big Government

If Trump or anyone else suggested that there is too much emphasis put on materialism in the United States, that might be appropriate if it wasn’t trying to justify higher taxes.

In other words, it isn’t necessarily unreasonable to say that people who don’t put an emphasis on materialism tend to be happier and more grateful for the things they do have.  This is probably true after reaching a certain point of wealth.

But here’s the problem.  Most people don’t want the government controlling the amount of wealth or material goods we are allowed to accumulate.

If I listen to a self-help podcast and make the decision that I don’t want to have so many material goods in my house, then I can make that decision.  It shouldn’t be the government’s decision to make for me.  It certainly doesn’t justify raising taxes on the goods and services we buy in the name of reducing materialism.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s political career has been largely successful because he speaks out against the ruling elite. This statement from Trump makes him sound like one of the out-of-touch elitists that he so often criticizes.

If Trump’s presidency and his attitude continue down this path, he will be a deeply unpopular president.  He is already hated by about half of America.

Even some Trump supporters will start to lose their patience with him if Trump thinks he can dictate how many baby dolls your kids should be allowed to own.