I have been an advocate of the permanent portfolio for over 20 years now. It was probably around 2002 or 2003 when I first read Harry Browne’s little book titled “Fail-Safe Investing”. I got the honor of meeting Harry Browne in 2004 during the Libertarian Party of Florida’s state convention.
I had the chance to tell him that I really appreciated his political work and that his book on setting up a permanent portfolio was really great. He was quite kind and told me to send him an email, and he would send me an updated list of funds to consider for the portfolio. I emailed him after the convention was over, and he replied as promised.
I haven’t exactly followed the portfolio in a rigid way through the years. I have made modifications. I have also used the mutual fund PRPFX, which does have some variations of its own. PRPFX holds Swiss francs and also holds a small amount of silver.
But overall, I have used the permanent portfolio as something of a home base. There is always a chunk of investments there for relative safety. Of course, you can never have absolute safety with any investments.
Not Flashy
The hard part about investing in the permanent portfolio (or something similar) is that you will feel left behind at times. This has been especially true since 2009 when the last major downturn in stocks ended. To be sure, there have been bad periods since that time, but the overall trend for stocks has been up.
There are so many financial advisors and financial pundits out there who give you some formula for your portfolio. Sometimes it is just a mix of stocks and bonds that changes based on your age and risk tolerance. There are surprisingly many people who advocate that you just put everything in a no-load mutual fund or ETF that tracks U.S. stocks if you don’t need the money in the next five years or so.
This strategy has worked reasonably well since 2009 because we haven’t had a major bear market since that time. The problem is that it doesn’t mean it will keep working well.
I always like to point to Japan – a first-world country – where the stock index peaked in 1989. It was still down 3 decades later.
If anything even half as bad as that occurred in the U.S., many people would be financially devastated. It would ruin a lot of plans.
We could also have other scenarios. In the U.S. in the 1970s, stocks didn’t do well during much of that time while price inflation was raging. Again, another scenario like that would ruin the retirement plans of a lot of people.
The permanent portfolio is dull and boring until it isn’t. If we experience a bear market in stocks where the overall stock market goes down about 50% over the course of 2 or 3 years, your permanent portfolio will be looking good. It may go down during that time, but it will likely be a lot less than 50%.
And one of the great things, if you can stay disciplined, is that you can rebalance the portfolio by selling off some assets that have done relatively well and buying assets that are down in price.
The Gold
The most controversial part about the permanent portfolio is the holding of 25% gold or gold equivalents. This is why it doesn’t get much attention from the more establishment financial world.
Even here though, there are many more “mainstream” financial gurus who will now recommend holding something like 5 to 10 percent in gold just to level out the wild swings of a portfolio.
This isn’t an all-or-nothing game, or at least it doesn’t need to be. If you are skeptical about holding 25% in gold and gold funds in your portfolio, you can always just go with 10 to 15 percent. Just having that amount will add great diversification and help smooth out the wild rides.
War, Inflation, Lockdowns, Political Chaos
A lot has happened just in the last decade. We have had Trump, Biden, and Trump again. There has been political chaos. There have been many wars and conflicts, including in Ukraine and several countries that produce significant oil. We had COVID lockdowns. We had a brief but significant period of high price inflation that hit around 2022.
A lot has happened, and it continues to happen. Stocks have stayed strong through most of this, especially when there are assurances from the Federal Reserve that it will give us easy money when needed.
If you had known in 2009 what would happen – politically speaking – over the next 16 years, you might not have invested in stocks. If you had known in 2009 what investments would do, you would have put your money in stocks for the next 16 years instead of in the permanent portfolio, if you had to buy and hold. Actually, you probably would have bought something like Bitcoin when it was $10.
Of course, we don’t know what the future holds, and that is the reason for the permanent portfolio. We also buy insurance for things because the future is uncertain, and we want some protection.
Overall, the permanent portfolio has done its job well. There have been big gains over the last couple of years because the price of gold has exploded while stocks have continued to trend higher.
I am fine with a slightly lower return if it means more safety and less anxiety when the next form of political or economic chaos hits.
The permanent portfolio will continue to act as a great home base and something of an insurance policy for our uncertain future.