In 2023 and 2024, a presidential candidate with a populist message will have a good chance of winning. Sure, they will get trashed by the establishment and its media, but that comes with the territory.

In this, I am referring to a populist message with a libertarian angle. This isn’t a Bernie Sanders message where we need higher taxes on the rich and more government spending to supposedly help the poor. I am talking about a populist message for middle class America in the form of less government.

The only two major candidates who have any instinct in tapping into the struggles of middle class America are Donald Trump and Robert Kennedy Jr.

The problem is that Trump has no ambitions for fiscal sanity. He oversaw the great COVID fiasco where the government was handing out trillions of dollars to people to not work. It also paid money to businesses because they had been shut down.

Trump is attacking DeSantis because he supposedly wants to cut Social Security. So unless Trump is going to dramatically cut military spending (which won’t happen, the same as it didn’t happen from 2017 to 2021), then overall spending by the federal government isn’t going down.

Of the major party candidates, Kennedy seems to be the best. He has a somewhat populist message, but even he is missing the opportunity to tap into the average middle class American. Whenever he talks about an issue, he should tie it back to the struggling middle class.

Everything Goes Back to the American Family

People get riled up over many issues, especially cultural issues. Sure, people care about immigration, abortion, “woke” ideology, schools, and many other issues. But those agenda issues are often set by the media and the politicians.

If you really get down to it, most families just want to work, save some money, and live a decent life. They certainly care about issues like crime and education, but these are really local issues. Does anyone honestly believe that their local school will get better if the “right” person becomes president?

Most parents want to take their kids to soccer practice, or gymnastics, or whatever activity. They want to be able to take a nice vacation once a year. They want to be able to save some money while not struggling through life because a trip to the grocery store costs $200.

The average American doesn’t care about Vivek Ramaswamy’s desire to bomb Mexican drug cartels. They don’t care about DeSantis taking on woke Disney. They don’t care about Haley, Scott, Christie, and Pence all supposedly wanting to support Ukraine (by prolonging the war).

The average American cares more about the cost of a dozen eggs. They care about the premium they have to pay for their home insurance. They care about the cost of health insurance and the latest car repair.

A Winning Populist Message

If I were promoting a particular candidate and had the opportunity to offer advice to their campaign, I would advise that they tie everything back to the cost of living.

“The American taxpayer is funding the war in Ukraine. It only serves to prolong the war and there is more death and destruction on both sides instead of reaching a peace deal. When you go to the grocery store and see that eggs are five dollars per dozen, just know that your higher grocery bill is partially due to funding these wars overseas.”

“I will oppose this “woke” ideology as president, but a lot of these cultural changes need to happen locally. In order to empower American families to protect their children, they need to have the resources to fight it, including the ability to withdraw their children from the public school system. They shouldn’t be forced to pay for all of the bad stuff coming out of Washington DC while their children are stuck in a bad situation due to a lack of resources.”

“The federal government is spending about $50,000 per household per year. Imagine if the cost of government were cut in half. You could get a new $25,000 roof in one year. You could send your child to private school. You could finally take that vacation you have dreamed of. You could save money while not having to struggle to pay for the monthly bills. Imagine just how much better your life could be with an extra $25,000 per year.”

Someone Try It

A total populist message tying everything back to middle class America has not really been tried in recent history. It is a missed opportunity for political candidates. Trump in 2015/ 2016 was the closest thing to tapping into it.

Political candidates are allowing the media to dictate what they talk about. In the meantime, middle class America is getting screwed.

If you just acknowledge the plight of the middle class in 2023, that will win over a lot of people. They want an advocate. They want someone to acknowledge that they are getting screwed. They want someone to say that life is expensive and that it doesn’t need to be this way.

When it comes to politicians, it seems like most of them get corrupted as soon as they get into office, even if that wasn’t their intention to start. I think the long-term key to gaining greater liberty is in educating people about the benefits of liberty. However, it can still be important as to who is elected to office.

It was very important who the governor of each state was in 2020 and 2021. Most of them declared themselves to be dictators and ordered lockdowns. But some were worse than others. For me, it made a difference living in Florida in 2020 and 2021. If there had been a governor other than Ron DeSantis, things could have gone very differently.

At the level of the presidency, it doesn’t seem like anything ever changes for the better. But it is hard to believe there could be a bigger disaster than Biden. I’m sure there could be, but it is just hard to imagine.

Dementia Isn’t the Problem

I was watching Gutfeld recently on Fox News. It is about the only thing I see on Fox News now with Tucker Carlson gone. They were discussing Biden and what they would say to him if given the opportunity.

A couple of people on the panel said something to the effect that there would be no point in talking to Biden because he wouldn’t understand them. They are basically saying that he has dementia.

That is not the response I would have given. I probably wouldn’t bother talking to Biden either, but it isn’t because he has dementia or wouldn’t be able to comprehend what I’m saying. It’s because he is evil.

There would be no point in trying to reason with Biden because there is no point in reasoning with a criminal unless you have some kind of leverage. If you are just giving advice, then the criminal isn’t going to take your advice unless it benefits him in some way.

Maybe that is the only possible way to approach someone like Biden. As an example, you could say that if he wants a good legacy and to be well liked, he should find a way to negotiate peace in Ukraine. Maybe that would have worked with Bill Clinton, but I’m not even sure that Biden cares about his legacy at this point. If he did, he wouldn’t be following the orders of his handlers on every single point.

You Can’t Cure Dishonesty

If someone is incompetent, you can at least hope to get through to them. You can hope that maybe some competent people will help them out. Someone who is incompetent may accidentally get things right at times too.

If someone is dishonest, it is hard to change their personality. You would have to change them from an immoral person to a moral person. It’s not impossible for someone to change, but it’s unlikely.

Perhaps everyone is dishonest at times in their life. At the very least, you don’t share everything in your mind. But there is a level of dishonesty where you literally don’t care about other people or what happens to them. Your whole life is a giant lie.

Joe Biden is one giant lie. Anything he says of importance is likely a lie, or at least there is some kind of spin to it. The only time he isn’t lying is when he is threatening his enemies (e.g., MAGA Republicans).

So I would much rather have a moral and honest person in office than an immoral person. It is best to have someone who is competent and moral, but I would much prefer a moral person over a competent person who isn’t moral.

I’m not sure which is worse – an immoral and incompetent person (like current day Biden); or an immoral and competent person (like the Clintons).

The Presidential Candidates

Dave Smith isn’t running for president on the Libertarian Party ticket yet. He is smart and moral (even if his language isn’t always clean). He truly does want to advance liberty for the good of humankind.

Taking out Dave Smith, let’s talk about the major party candidates running for president.

I think the most honest person who wants to see America thrive is Robert Kennedy Jr. I have heard and read him enough to know that he really does care about other people and the future of our world. I think he gets some things wrong politically, but I see him overall as being competent too. But just the fact that his heart is in the right place puts him at the top of the list for me.

I struggle with the next person on the list. Donald Trump has a giant ego, and sometimes I do think he cares more about his own image than he cares about the direction of the country. But the two things aren’t mutually exclusive either. He wants a thriving and peaceful America so that he can brag about.

And while Trump has his moral shortcomings, I do think he is somewhat honest for a politician. That is one of the main reasons the establishment hates him so much. They especially hate him when he is honest about foreign policy and the so-called intelligence agencies.

Ron DeSantis is really hard to read. I have no idea if he is a moral person. But like Trump, I think he would want to see the country do well, even if it is just for his own image.

A lot of libertarians like Vivek Ramaswamy, but I do not trust him. He says he is 90% aligned with libertarians, but I don’t really believe it. And even if true, the other 10% is egregious. He wants conflict with China, and he wants to bomb Mexican drug cartels.

I believe Ramaswamy is changing his message constantly and catering to his audience when he speaks. If he is on a libertarian podcast, he will sound more libertarian. So I can’t really trust him.

All of the other Republicans are absolutely terrible. Some are more competent than others, but they are all immoral. I can judge that just from their foreign policy views. Christ Christie, Mike Pence, Nikki Haley, and Tim Scott are all terrible. Even if they are smart, I would never support them.

Of course, Biden is evil, so I would never support him even if he were competent.

Conclusion

If you ever detect dishonesty coming from someone running for political office, your instincts are probably correct. You shouldn’t support them, even if they seem to be saying some of the right things.

Have you ever known anyone to become more libertarian once they get in office? Maybe it’s happened, but I can’t think of any recent examples.

Most people go the other way. If we ever got a President Ramaswamy, he would quickly forget about getting rid of the Department of Education, and he would focus on all of the areas where he is really bad.

I have slight hope that if RFK Jr. were to become president, he would actually attempt to make peace in the world.

The ruling elite have been evil for a long time now. It has long been the case that the ruling class does not have the average American’s interests at heart. If they weren’t actually wishing harm against innocent people, they at least didn’t really care.

I’m not sure that the current ruling elite are any more evil than in past generations. Perhaps they are, but I believe that Johnson and the CIA murdered John F. Kennedy, so you can’t get much more evil than that.

The scary part about the current ruling elite is just how brazen and open they are about their evil. They haven’t gotten to the point of outright saying they are evil to the American people, but they are really flaunting their antics.

When Trump was indicted, Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet with her wearing a hat that says, “But Her Emails”. (I don’t like linking to Hillary Clinton’s Twitter account, but it is there in case you want the evidence.)

Hillary Clinton committed a crime when she deleted her emails from her time as Secretary of State. And in this context, it doesn’t matter whether or not you think it should be a crime. I don’t know if it is “whataboutism” to bring this up in light of the Trump indictment, but it is certainly relevant.

What Hillary did is far more serious than anything Trump has been accused of doing with classified documents. Aside from the fact that she likely possessed emails that showed her own criminality while Trump possessed documents showing the criminality of the national security state, her actions were far worse and more blatant than anything Trump did.

Why Bring It Up?

I already know that Hillary is a career criminal. What is so surprising is that she is openly flaunting the fact that she can get away with anything.

If you committed a crime like this, you would think you would keep your mouth shut. Or at the very least, you wouldn’t actually bring up one of the crimes that you committed.

But this is what the ruling elite do now. Even though Hillary isn’t in political office, she is still part of the establishment and the ruling elite. The same goes for Obama.

I remember feeling this way when the Democrats impeached Trump for having a phone call with the Ukrainian president and asking for an investigation on Biden. They accused Trump of using U.S. taxpayer dollars to bribe the Ukrainians.

The problem here is that Joe Biden is on video doing the thing (or worse) that Trump was accused of doing. Biden threatened to withhold a billion dollars in foreign aid funds if the prosecutor wasn’t fired, who was investigating the company his son worked for.

I remember thinking, “Why, of all things, would they impeach Trump for something that Biden already openly did as vice president?”

One answer is – because they could. They knew that NBC, CNN, and the rest of the establishment media wouldn’t be running those clips of Biden bragging about getting the prosecutor fired. Maybe someone like Tucker Carlson would air it, but it would mostly just be his audience seeing it.

In Whose Face?

When Biden or Hillary openly flaunt their criminality, you have to wonder who they are taunting.

I think it is making their supporters look stupid, but they are too stupid to realize it at this point. Or at least that’s what they’re saying. And it’s also what the corporate media is saying.

I think it is a middle finger to Americans who do understand what is going on. It doesn’t matter if it is a libertarian, or a MAGA Republican, or the average Joe Rogan listener.

When Hillary Clinton sends out a tweet like that, she is saying something to the effect of, “Screw you peasants. I am part of the ruling elite. I am untouchable. I can basically do whatever I want and get away with it, and there is nothing you can do about it. Ha ha.”

Even though Hillary Clinton will refer to her opponents as a basket of deplorables, I think she knows that they are smarter than what she would ever admit. She knows they know. And we should know that she knows that we know.

But Hillary and company are evil. They have no morals. They just want power for the sake of power. So we are at the point where they openly brag about being able to get away with anything.

I have to admit that it makes me a bit uncomfortable. Sometimes I liked it better when the evil was behind the scenes and they had to lie a lot to cover for their evil. They surely still lie, but sometimes they brazenly tell the truth now.

I have some hope that these criminals are overplaying their hand. They probably overplayed it just by indicting Trump. Just because Hillary, Obama, Biden, and the other criminals have never been fully exposed for the world to see, it doesn’t mean it can’t happen. They are getting extremely sloppy and overconfident in their ability to get away with their evil.

The FOMC released its latest monetary policy statement. It came a day after the May 2023 CPI report came out showing a slowdown in the rate of price inflation.

The Fed will maintain its target for the federal funds rate between 5 and 5.25 percent. This is the first time the Fed has paused since it started its hiking campaign in 2022.

The statement reads in part: “Holding the target range steady at this meeting allows the Committee to assess additional information and its implications for monetary policy, the lags with which monetary policy affects economic activity and inflation, and economic and financial developments.”

The Fed will continue to reduce its balance sheet holdings, which means there is still a policy of slight monetary deflation.

The statement reassured the public that, “The U.S. banking system is sound and resilient.” So you can probably expect another significant bank failure any day now.

It is interesting that Powell is saying that Fed officials may increase rates slightly more in the near future and that they don’t expect a drop in rates for the next two years.

Until the Economy Implodes

It’s easy to say now that the Fed will keep rates where they are or even increase them slightly. It will be just as easy to change course and quickly lower rates again when the economy starts to implode.

Things seem to happen slowly and then all of a sudden. This is especially true when we have a majorly inverted yield curve. In fact, the yield curve has been inverted for many months now. This is the biggest flashing warning signal we could ever hope to receive.

Yet, the Fed is pretending like everything is basically ok. It’s something to the effect of: “Sure, there have been a few banks that have gone under. Inflation has been a bit of problem, but we’re getting that under control. We may have some sluggish growth, but we’ll manage the economy and navigate a soft landing.”

When everything comes crashing down, I’m not sure what the narrative will be. It may be: “Nobody could have seen this coming.” Or maybe it will be: “There were warning signs, but we didn’t want to scare anyone.”

I think the Fed knows that there is major danger ahead. I think their fear of future price inflation is less now, and it has shifted to a fear of a massive economic downturn.

I have said that the Fed won’t purposely bail out the stock market. They will bail out a fragile bond market and a fragile banking system.

The Everything Bubble

We are still in the Everything Bubble. Even with interest rates rising, housing prices are still holding up in many areas. A lot of homeowners actually don’t want to sell because they have a low interest rate mortgage locked in. So it is keeping houses off the market.

But this can change very quickly once prices start to drop and the economy goes into recession.

Stocks have the potential to fall really hard. I’m not talking about 30%. I’m talking about 50% or 60%. Maybe it will be even more, but at that point everything else will be so bad that the Fed is likely to intervene.

Long-term bonds are likely to gain in value as interest rates go back down. This is far from a guarantee, but investors still see U.S. bonds as a form of safety.

Gold may end up being one of the least volatile assets, even in terms of dollars.

Speculation

In terms of speculation, I think there is a play to short the market. The problem, as with most investing, is the timing. The stock market crash could start tomorrow. Or maybe it won’t start until January 2024.

And even when it does start, it will be a roller coaster. There will be short-term rallies in hopes that the Fed will intervene.

It is easy to buy inverse ETFs that go up when the market goes down. The problem with these funds is that they are only good for the short term. You don’t want to buy one of these and hold them for a long period of time. So it really is a speculation, and it is something where you need to be active in monitoring.

I will probably dip my toe in shorting the market in the near term. If the inverted yield curve fails me here, I will probably give up speculating in the investment markets. I think we should trust that a recession is coming.

The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) numbers came out. The CPI was up 0.1% in May 2023. It now stands at 4% year-over-year.

The less volatile median CPI came in at 0.4% in May, with the year-over-year now at 6.7%.

So the rate of increase seems to be going down, which is a small piece of good news for middle class America.

Still, the improving number is still at 4%, which is double the Fed’s target. If you spend like the CPI is measured, then your dollars still depreciated by 4% over the last year, and that is after sustaining far worse before that.

The price of gold initially went up, but then ended the day lower. Stocks went higher on the news, as investors see this as good news for stocks because the Fed is less likely to hike its target rate at the next meeting, which just happens to be tomorrow – June 14.

I have generally been in the camp of expecting price inflation to decline because of the Fed’s very tight money policy.

Stock Investors are Looking at the News All Wrong

Maybe some stock investors are getting it right. There are many day traders who hop in and out of the market. Some of them are making money.

But for the investors who are buying and holding U.S. stocks, it has disaster written all over it.

The lower CPI is good news, but it is also serving as a warning signal that a recession is on the horizon. Actually, the extremely inverted yield curve is the main warning signal, but the lower CPI is just confirmation.

To be sure, there isn’t a tradeoff between economic growth and inflation. The 1970s blew that myth out of the water. You can certainly have high inflation (price or monetary) and still have recession.

But in this case of 2023, the Fed has had a tight money policy for over a year. They have been raising interest rates in the face of an inverted yield curve.

If the Fed doesn’t reverse course because it has to bail out the banking system, and it keeps a relatively tight money policy, then we should expect consumer price inflation to go down, and we should expect a recession sooner rather than later.

I am investing accordingly. The major fall in stocks is going to happen. How much of a bigger warning sign do investors need at this point?

I wrote very little about the debt ceiling leading up to the debt ceiling “deal” that just recently happened. I think the only time I mentioned it was when writing about yields on short-term U.S. Treasury bills.

On April 25, 2013, I wrote: “I have little doubt that the Republicans in Congress will allow the debt ceiling to be raised. Sure, there will be much political theater, and maybe there will be some concessions to have the appearance of some fiscal sanity, but I highly doubt either party will allow for an outright default at this stage of the game.”

I spent little time writing about the debt ceiling drama because the outcome was so utterly predictable. It always happens this way. There is always a “deal” in the end. It is a deal for the state planners. It isn’t a deal for the American people, and this time was no different.

Thomas Massie Supports Debt Ceiling Deal

It was surprising that my two favorite people in Congress supported this whole fiasco. Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) went along with the debt ceiling deal. She is typically courageous, outspoken, and mostly good on the issues. But she’s still a conservative and not a libertarian, so I am not completely surprised by this.

I was more surprised about Thomas Massie, who is the most libertarian member of Congress. It was Massie who held up the trillions of dollars in COVID emergency spending in 2020. That is what led Trump to denounce Massie and say that the Republicans should kick him out.

Massie and MTG both supported Kevin McCarthy for Speaker of the House when there was that drama. They at least supported him in the sense of voting for him. I understood this for strategic reasons. They were gaining more power (in a good way) over committees and saw that they would get some valid investigations.

McCarthy did have a hand in releasing January 6th footage to Tucker Carlson, so McCarthy hasn’t been all bad up to this point. Even if he did it for purely political reasons, you can understand why MTG and Massie would take this outcome.

But on the debt ceiling deal, I really don’t understand. Massie has tried to explain that the deal isn’t anything great, but it is about as good as we can hope for because it may force slight cuts in spending.

His reasoning wasn’t strong for me. I think he got it wrong on this one. I am not willing to completely discount him from now on because of this one action, but it is a strike against him in my book.

It just shows that there is no Ron Paul in Congress.

If You’re Going to Compromise…

It isn’t always easy to decide how to vote in Congress if you are truly trying to gain greater liberty for the people. Do you vote for something that is unconstitutional if it moves you in the right direction? If you can get a 50% cut in funding of the Department of Education, should you support it even though it is still funding an unconstitutional department?

I don’t know if there is anything unconstitutional about this debt ceiling deal. I don’t think it actually approves any spending, but I could be wrong on that point. It allows the U.S. Treasury to issue more debt.

Anyway, I would have voted against this thing even if I thought it would lead to a little reduced spending. One of the reasons is that the recent baseline is ridiculous. The spending next year will still be over $1 trillion more than it was in 2019.

Spending absolutely exploded in 2020 and 2021 with the excuse of COVID lockdowns – which the federal government recommended and state and local governments implemented. So it is a bit of a joke to say you can cut spending by 1% or so from last year after it had gone up so much before that.

Imagine a family that makes $60,000 a year in income. The family is spending $70,000 per year and racking up credit card debt to the tune of $10,000 per year. The next year, the family has an emergency and has to spend $90,000 that year. Then the emergency ends.

The next year, the husband/ father presents a budget to his wife. He says they are only going to spend $85,000 this coming year. He is cutting the budget by $5,000 from the previous year.

Would you call that fiscal sanity?

The Unlimited Debt Ceiling

It seems that the debt ceiling is basically unlimited at this point. Actually, with this “deal”, it is unlimited until 2025.

The other joke in all of this is that there is nothing binding on future spending. It is easy for Congress to override any promises made in this bill. They can always push it off to the next session of Congress.

If any true fiscal conservative is going to agree to anything, it should be for significant spending cuts right here and now. It shouldn’t be about what Congress will spend 2 years from now or 10 years from now. That never happens.

The government is still collecting something around $4.7 trillion per year from taxes. So even if the debt ceiling weren’t raised, it can still pay interest on the debt and fund the so-called entitlement programs. But they have an empire to run around the world, and they have to make sure that the war in Ukraine keeps going.

So they’ll threaten grandma that the Social Security checks may not come if there isn’t a debt ceiling deal, but they won’t threaten an end to funding the oligarchs in Ukraine.

If someone in Congress wanted to avoid drastic and sudden spending cuts while also moving towards more fiscal responsibility, they could at least propose something like raising the debt ceiling by $50 billion per month. After one year, it could go to increasing by $40 billion per month.

If this trajectory held, then you would eventually get to a balanced budget.

To start off by raising it by $50 billion per month, that would be $600 billion per year. So Congress would actually have to cut spending because the annual deficits are way beyond that mark at this point. But we can’t even take that modest step.

Future Generations and Current Generations

There is one last point I have about the overall national debt that is widely misunderstood.

We often hear that future generations will pay for this. And that is correct. Of course, they could choose to default, but they are still paying for it in the sense of less compounding growth.

But let’s be real clear that increasing the debt hurts us right here and right now. We are taking productive capital and handing it over to the government to spend. Perhaps more accurately, we are handing it over to government to waste and misallocate.

We are getting poorer right now than we otherwise would have been because of the increasing debt. A decrease in government spending might hurt some specific individuals who benefit from it, but society as a whole would be wealthier if the government spent less. That capital could be used for productive purposes to make consumer goods and services cheaper.

It is actually amazing how much people are still able to flourish in an environment where the national government alone is consuming over $6 trillion per year. Just imagine how much wealthier we would be if that number were cut in half.

I have written some rather scathing articles on Thomas Sowell. They go back a long way. One of the reasons I have even bothered to write about Sowell is because many libertarians have idolized him.

As far as I know, Sowell is still alive. He will turn 93 at the end of this month, but he no longer publishes articles.

Sowell certainly had a talent for writing. His writing was clear, concise, and oftentimes convincing. He was very good on economics when it didn’t involve the topic of central banking. He was very good on his writings about race.

I made the case in January 2012 that Sowell is far from being a libertarian. I called him an elitist and a moron, and I don’t typically call names. It was my frustration coming through when Sowell was being critical of Ron Paul and those who supported him.

I went after Sowell again in 2015 when he wrote an article in favor of vaccines, to put it mildly. My article was titled “Thomas Sowell: A Statist’s View on Vaccines“. It was in response to an article written by Sowell about vaccines and autism.

Sowell Never Was in the Liberty Camp

I still see things to this day praising Sowell. It is people who are generally in the pro liberty camp who will sing his praises. I often see quotes attributed to Sowell that were supposedly a warning to today’s increasing totalitarianism.

I recently read an article discussing the COVID vaccines. This was from someone criticizing the vaccines and mandates. Yet, one of the commenters referenced Thomas Sowell and his warnings about government and authoritarianism. This person obviously didn’t know what Sowell’s position was on vaccines.

In that 2015 article by Sowell, he said there were false claims that linked autism with vaccines. Sowell claimed that the number of children who had autism had remained relatively stable. It was just that the definition had changed.

I think it is quite evident that autism has increased dramatically in our world today (or in 2015) as compared to a couple of generations ago. But I can see where people would have disagreements here, just as there are disagreements on whether any increase is due to vaccines.

But the kicker in Sowell’s article is the last sentence. He says:

“Some say the decision to vaccinate or not should be the parents’ choice. That would be fine if their child would live isolated from other children. But that is impossible.”

In other words, since that is impossible, Sowell favored mandatory vaccination by the state.

Replace Measles with COVID

Sowell specifically referenced measles in his article. I’m not sure why he didn’t reference the MMR vaccine, which includes measles, because this is the vaccine that is most often claimed has a link to autism.

Before the 1970s, measles was a common occurrence. For most kids, it meant a few days sick at home. With anything, there are always risks. It was possible to die from (or with) the measles, but it was extremely rare. I would say it was far more rare than getting autism.

You can watch an old episode of The Brady Bunch where all of the kids get the measles. There was no panic that their lives were in danger. It is hard for them to go back and change the narrative now.

Anyway, Sowell was very clear in 2015 that it should not be the choice of parents whether or not to vaccinate their kids. Since children couldn’t live isolated, they should not have that decision. Presumably, that decision would be made by the state.

Sowell specifically wrote an article on this. It wasn’t some throwaway line in an interview. So if Sowell favored forced vaccination in 2015 for something like the measles, then surely he would have favored forced vaccination for COVID in 2021.

Unless Sowell changed his views in his late 80s or early 90s, then he supported Joe Biden’s COVID “vaccine” mandates. After all, it wasn’t possible for people to live in isolation. So according to Sowell, it isn’t their decision. It is the government’s decision.

Anti Liberty

Some people got annoyed by my articles criticizing Sowell in 2012 and 2015. Sure, they say, he wasn’t a perfect libertarian or he wasn’t perfect on every issue, but he was generally great in favor of liberty.

I don’t really care how many great books he wrote or how many great quotes there are by Sowell. He wasn’t just off on a couple of issues. He was terrible on the biggest issues. He was terrible on foreign policy, and he was terrible on the issue of central banking. And on top of it all, he favored mandatory vaccination.

I don’t care how great Sowell might have been on race or tax issues or explaining supply and demand. He got the really critical issues wrong. And it was positions like his in 2015 on forced vaccination that led us to the forced COVID shots in 2021.

Sowell wasn’t just off on a few issues. He was part of the problem. How many people read his 2015 article and accepted that it was ok to favor forced vaccination and still be in the liberty camp?

We can directly thank people like Thomas Sowell who set the stage for Joe Biden COVID shot mandates in 2021. I think libertarians should really stop praising the guy so much. He was wrong on all of the most important issues.

There is a lot going on politically and culturally in the U.S. and around the world. When this decade is over in 2030, it is hard to say what the big stories will be.

If there is no nuclear war or major world war, then the story inside the United States might be the decline of the American middle class.

The problem is that this isn’t a story that makes headline news. It isn’t something that just all of a sudden happens like other big events.

Maybe there will be the occasional report on the decline in real wages, but it won’t get much attention after that. Yet, for most people, this is a really big story.

While the people alive today get to enjoy technology as never seen before, living expenses for basic needs have gone higher than in previous generations.

It is a sad state of affairs when you can see that the young generation of today might be worse off than their parents.

Just as economic growth slowly compounds over time and is barely noticed, the slow economic decline is barely noticed at first.

Compounding Declines

Compounding interest is a beautiful thing when you are able to take advantage of it. Unfortunately, compounding can work in the other direction too.

If price inflation is running at 5% and wages are going up at 3%, then you are losing 2% per year. It’s actually a little worse than this because you have to pay taxes on the additional 3% in nominal wages.

When this happens year after year, it starts to add up. The first 2% might not feel like much. It might just mean a little less accumulated in savings. It might mean eating out one fewer time per month.

But then it starts to grind you down. The cuts you made last year aren’t enough to get you through this year. And the harder cuts you have to make this year aren’t going to get you through next year when your real wages decline again.

Even if wages after taxes keep up with price inflation for one year, you are still down from the preceding years when wages didn’t keep up.

Different Worlds

At the risk of sounding like Bernie Sanders, there seem to be two classes of people. There are the rich, and there is everybody else.

Maybe there is a third category of the upper middle class who are doing well but still on the treadmill of life. They are able to afford many luxuries and show no signs of struggling financially, but if they ever experienced a significant decline in income, they would quickly be poor.

I see it in my own life and the people I know. There are some people who are almost careless with money. They will be quick to throw around hundreds of dollars for very minor conveniences. Then I know people who are just barely getting by and having to pinch every penny.

I feel like the disparity has grown in the last few years. I have seen almost no change in the behavior of the people I know who are well off. If anything, they are spending more than ever. The people who are middle class but barely getting by are having a much tougher time today than, say, 4 years ago.

Of course, I don’t blame those who are doing well as long as they are making their money honestly. I don’t think they should be as wasteful or careless with their money as I often see, but it is their choice.

The solutions of the likes of Bernie Sanders consist of more government spending and intervention, which is the opposite of what we need. A major reason for the big disparity right now is exactly that, coupled with a previously loose monetary policy from the Federal Reserve.

A Six-Figure Salary

I saw a recent post by someone in a financial independence (FI) community saying that their family income was about $90,000 per year and they were barely making it. They were able to contribute to a 401k plan, but there wasn’t much to save after that.

Her housing expenses were less than $1,000 per month, so it probably wasn’t a high cost of living area. I don’t know if that included taxes and insurance, or if it was just principal plus interest on the mortgage. Still, it isn’t a big housing payment in today’s world.

The comments in response were interesting. Some people were critical saying that she should be able to save with that kind of income. But I think most of those comments were coming from people who either made more money, already had significant savings, or didn’t have any children at home. (Kids are expensive, no matter what anyone says.)

Many other comments were sympathetic, and many people could relate even if their situation wasn’t quite the same. There was definitely somewhat of a common feeling that prices are going higher and wages are not keeping up.

It is sad to say that making a low six-figure income in today’s world isn’t really that great. It is better than a lot of other people, but it doesn’t put you into any kind of wealthy or rich status. You can certainly become wealthy over time with a low six-figure salary and frugal living, but it will take you a long while.

Most people don’t want to live very frugally though. If you have a family, you want to be able to take a vacation. You want your kids to be able to play sports and go to the fair. You want to be able to eat out at a restaurant once in a while. It’s nice to have a streaming service to enjoy some movies.

A Revolt of the Middle Class

The decline of the American middle class is a result of massive government intrusion in our lives. The decline of the American middle class may also be the only thing that will stop and reverse this intrusion.

It’s easy for Americans to not pay attention to some war overseas. It is easy to take a political position on this or that issue. But when a formerly middle class family is all of a sudden struggling to pay the bills and put food on the table, they may start paying attention.

The $100 billion or so being sent to Ukraine doesn’t sell as easily with the American public when American living standards are in decline.

There is a big recession coming, and there will likely be big changes that come with it. One morning, the American middle class will wake up and realize that they are no longer middle class, and they aren’t living the so-called American dream.

This is when positive change towards liberty becomes possible.