Let’s say that SARS-COV-2 is exactly what the medical establishment tells us what it is, even though the virus was never properly isolated.

Let’s say that the PCR tests used to test people are accurate, even though they are often run at 35 cycles or higher, which even Dr. Fauci admitted will spit out false positives, and even though the creator of the test – Kary Mullis – said it should not be used for diagnostic purposes by itself.

Let’s say that this is a really deadly virus and the death count is accurate, even though the CDC changed its guidelines in March and April 2020 to essentially count anyone who dies with COVID-19 as a COVID-19 death, and hospitals received increased reimbursement for coding patients as COVID-19 positive.

Let’s say that society at large is willing to accept sacrifices to mostly save people who were on the verge of death anyway, even though those sacrifices mean higher unemployment, economic depression, increased anxiety, loneliness, and higher rates of suicide.

Let’s say that locking down society by shutting down “non-essential” businesses makes a significant difference, even though there seems to be no difference in cases and deaths in places that locked down heavily as compared to those that didn’t.

Let’s say that we could achieve keeping people at home and closing down businesses on a voluntary basis, even though it was only through state force that this could be widely achieved.

Even granting all of those things, what is to say that masking, social distancing, getting rid of large gatherings, and having people stay at home was the answer to this virus?

If the virus is deadly to those who are elderly and those who are in bad health, wouldn’t it have made more sense for the other 90% of the population to carry on with life as normal and achieve herd immunity?

I believe very little, if anything, of significance coming from the establishment media.  But even if everything that we have been told has been true, and even if we ignore the immorality of controlling others, the lockdowns still don’t make any sense.

People make judgments every single day, including how much risk to take.  If there were a really deadly and contagious virus with people dropping dead all around you, then human behavior would react rather quickly.  For most people, if they personally knew just a couple of people, who were relatively young and healthy, who dropped dead because of a virus, then they would act accordingly. It wouldn’t require a governor or mayor to tell them to stay home.

It is a bit of a joke when you see people in the store walking around with a mask on, as if that will protect them from the plague.  If it was really a high-risk situation, then I’m pretty sure most people wouldn’t be shopping for shoes.  Even with groceries, if you thought there was a one percent chance of contracting a virus with a one percent chance of dying if contracting it, that would probably be enough for a lot of people to order their groceries online.

Most people aren’t terrified of COVID-19.  If they are, their actions don’t really represent that.  But there is a small segment of the population that really is terrified and have mostly stayed home for the last year.  For their sake, wouldn’t it be better for those willing to “risk it” to live something of a normal (prior to March 2020) life?

If every healthy person under the age of 65 went about their life as before, then any virus would quickly spread and dissipate.  It’s not that the risk would be lowered to zero, but most elderly people and those in poor health would probably feel a lot more comfortable by now going about their lives.

I can’t think of a more tortured way to deal with a supposedly deadly and contagious virus. If anything, not only is it just prolonging the whole thing, it actually makes the more vulnerable people even more vulnerable.  It would have been better if the people willing to take on the risk had been allowed to live their lives.  They would have “achieved” herd immunity and provided some protection for others.

And now that the establishment is promoting their vaccines, they have to admit that herd immunity is a factor.  It was something taboo to mention a year ago, or even 6 months ago.  But if vaccines are going to “work”, there has to be herd immunity.  Otherwise, it just means that people can be reinfected, or it means that people who get vaccinated can easily spread the virus.

If the vaccines actually work, then we should reach herd immunity at some point.  Otherwise, they are mostly pointless at best.

If we are to believe what the establishment tells us about the virus (which is often contradictory in itself), then we could have easily achieved herd immunity a while ago. Life would have gone on as normal for most people, and life would be mostly back to normal for those who were fearful and stayed home until things fizzled out.

Not only were these lockdowns wrong, which destroyed millions of people’s lives; they also made no sense in terms of protecting vulnerable people.